THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT AFTER SHELBY COUNTY V. HOLDER: A POTENTIAL FIX TO REVIVE SECTION 5

The Voting Rights Act After Shelby County v. Holder: A Potential Fix to Revive Section 5

The Voting Rights Act After Shelby County v. Holder: A Potential Fix to Revive Section 5

Blog Article

The passage of coq-clear 100 ubiquinol the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) was a momentous occasion for minority voters in the United States, and its positive effects could be measured immediately.However, when Section 4 of the VRA was declared unconstitutional in Shelby County v.Holder (2013), the ability of the VRA to continue its protection of minority voters iphone 14 price san francisco was called into question.We argue that the VRA is still necessary and propose an administrative notification system that could fix the issues with Sections 4 and 5.

Report this page